TL;DR: Power BI Pro is a per-user creator license for sharing reports across a small to mid-sized analyst base, while Power BI Premium (now sold as Fabric F-SKU capacity) is a dedicated-capacity tier that lets unlimited free viewers consume content, unlocks larger models, paginated reports, AI features, and on-premises Power BI Report Server rights. The break-even sits around 250 to 500 viewers per workload, so the right choice depends on viewer-to-creator ratio, model size, and which advanced features the workload actually uses.
Watch on YouTube
End-to-End Microsoft Power BI Implementation and Migration
A short walkthrough of how Kanerika scopes, delivers, and migrates Power BI environments for enterprise clients, including license rationalization on Fabric.
A regional bank we worked with had bought Power BI Pro for every analyst, every finance manager, and every executive who once asked for a weekly KPI email. Three years later, only 80 of the 1,400 licensed users actually built reports. The rest just opened dashboards. The CFO asked a fair question, why are we paying a creator price for an audience that only watches? That is the question Power BI Premium vs Pro is really about, and most teams stumble on it because Microsoft markets the two SKUs as features when the real difference is the economics of who consumes what.
Key Takeaways Power BI Pro licenses people; Power BI Premium licenses tenant capacity. The right SKU follows from your consumption shape, not your headcount alone. Pro lists at $14 per user per month. Premium Per User (PPU) lists at $24. Fabric F64 capacity, the SKU that unlocks free-viewer rights, lists at $5,002.67 per month pay-as-you-go. Below ~250 total users, Pro almost always wins. Between 250 and 500, the answer depends on creator share. Above 500 with a read-heavy mix, Premium almost always wins. PPU is the middle path for a small advanced team that needs Premium features (larger models, paginated reports, AutoML) without buying tenant capacity. In 2024 Microsoft retired the Premium P SKUs and replaced them with Fabric F SKUs. Buying Premium today means buying Microsoft Fabric capacity with Power BI bundled in. Kanerika has run Power BI licensing reviews for retailers with 4,000 viewers, manufacturers with 200 plant managers, and banks with 1,500 mixed users; the right SKU follows from usage, not the reseller’s default. Power BI Pro and Power BI Premium solve different problems. Pro licenses people, Premium licenses capacity, and the cost crossover happens earlier than most buyers expect. The decision also got more complicated in 2024, when Premium capacity SKUs (P) were retired and replaced by Fabric F SKUs , which means a “Premium capacity” purchase today is actually a Microsoft Fabric purchase with Power BI bundled in. This guide unpacks the SKUs, the features, the math, the migration path, and the trap doors, so you can pick the licensing model that fits your actual usage rather than the one your reseller defaults to.
Power BI Pro vs Premium at a Glance Power BI Pro is a per-user license. Anyone who creates, publishes, shares, or even consumes Pro-licensed content needs their own Pro seat. It costs around $14 per user per month and is the default Power BI license for individual analysts and small teams that all build and share dashboards together.
Power BI Premium is not a per-user upgrade in the same sense. It is a tenant-level purchase of dedicated compute capacity. Authors still need a Pro or Premium Per User license to publish content, but once content lives inside a Premium capacity workspace, an unlimited number of users on the free Power BI license can view it. That single rule changes the math at scale. Microsoft’s current pricing page lists three relevant SKUs: Pro at $14 per user, Premium Per User (PPU) at $24 per user, and Microsoft Fabric capacity starting at F2 with the well-known F64 SKU as the threshold that unlocks free-viewer rights for Power BI.
Listen on Spotify
Microsoft Fabric vs. Power BI: What to Use in 2026
The simplest way to hold the choice in your head is by who consumes the report. If almost everyone with access also builds, Pro is cheaper. If most people only view, Premium capacity is cheaper above a certain headcount. PPU sits in the middle, a single-user license that gives one author most of the Premium feature set without the capacity bill, useful for a small advanced team inside an otherwise Pro estate. The teams that get this wrong usually do so because they shop on features instead of on consumption shape, the same trap that derails many Power BI dashboard development projects before a single visual is built. The same shape-not-headcount logic applies to broader business intelligence and data visualization investments.
The Power BI Licensing Landscape: Free, Pro, PPU, Premium Capacity, Fabric Before the comparison, the SKU map. Power BI today has five licensing tiers that interact in ways the marketing pages do not always make obvious, and a clean mental model prevents the most common procurement mistakes.
Power BI Free (Desktop) . The authoring tool runs free on a workstation, useful for personal analysis, training, and learning DAX. Free users can also view content hosted in a Premium capacity workspace at F64 or above, which is the rule the entire “Premium for viewers” math rests on.Power BI Pro . A per-user license at $14 a month. Required to publish, share, or consume content that lives in a shared (non-Premium) workspace. Every analyst building or reading Pro content needs one.Power BI Premium Per User (PPU) . A per-user license at $24 a month. It gives one user most Premium features, larger model sizes, more refreshes, paginated reports, and advanced AI visuals, without buying tenant capacity. Useful when a small team needs Premium features but the enterprise has not crossed the capacity break-even.Microsoft Fabric capacity (F SKUs) . Tenant-level dedicated compute, billed hourly per SKU. Replaces the retired Power BI Premium P SKUs as the only path to capacity-based licensing. F64 and above unlock free-viewer rights for Power BI content, the rule that makes Premium economical at scale.Microsoft 365 E5 . Some enterprise Microsoft 365 plans bundle Power BI Pro for every E5 seat, which can make Pro effectively free for organizations that already pay for E5 anyway. Worth checking before you negotiate a separate Pro line item.The interaction worth flagging: Pro and PPU are author licenses; Premium capacity is a hosting tier. You almost always need both, an author license to publish, plus capacity if you want to give free users access to those reports. Treating Premium as a strict replacement for Pro is the single most common procurement misread, and it usually surfaces only after the first content gets uploaded.
How Power BI Premium Capacity Actually Works Premium capacity is the part of the comparison most buyers wave through. Understanding it is what separates a license decision from a guess, because almost every advanced feature in the comparison table flows from how this capacity is provisioned and billed.
A Fabric F SKU buys you dedicated v-cores in a Microsoft-managed region. That capacity runs your Power BI semantic models, paginated reports, dataflows, and (under Fabric) lakehouses, warehouses, and notebooks. Compute is measured in capacity units (CUs); each F SKU has a maximum CU rating and a smoothing window that absorbs short bursts of demand. The smaller the SKU, the easier it is to hit that limit during a refresh, which is the operational tradeoff teams underestimate when they buy F2 or F4 to “try” Premium.
F64, the threshold SKU, lists at $5,002.67 per month for pay-as-you-go (per Microsoft’s pricing page; the Azure reservation discount runs roughly 40% lower). Below F64, Power BI content in that capacity is still gated by per-user licenses; viewers without a Pro or PPU license cannot open the report. At and above F64, the same capacity grants the free-viewer right that turns the comparison around. The implication: there is no economy in F4 or F32 if your goal is to retire Pro seats. Either you stay on Pro, jump to F64, or pick PPU for a small advanced team. The mistake of buying F32 to “save money” usually triples the bill once the team realizes free viewers still need Pro.
Capacity also has a quiet failure mode called overload, where sustained CU consumption above the SKU limit throttles or queues new operations. Microsoft’s Fabric throttling and bursting documentation describes the smoothing logic in detail. The practical takeaway is that capacity sizing is not a one-time exercise; it is a workload modeling problem, and the teams that succeed treat it that way from the start.
Kanerika Service
Get Your Power BI Licensing Math Right
Kanerika runs a license audit against your real consumption shape, models the next 12 months of growth, and recommends the SKU that survives the next budget review.
Explore Power BI Services Feature-by-Feature Comparison: Power BI Pro vs Premium Below is the table buyers actually use to decide. The numbers are sourced from Microsoft’s current licensing documentation; we have flagged the boundaries that change behavior at scale rather than every minor difference.
The comparison matrix below lays out the headline differences across the four tiers people actually evaluate, Pro, PPU, Premium capacity at F64+, and the Fabric extras you inherit when you cross over.
A few features deserve more than a table cell of explanation, because they are where teams discover, late, that their license does not cover what their dashboard already promises.
Paginated reports , the pixel-perfect, often-printable reports SQL Server Reporting Services users know well, are not available on Pro. They require PPU for a single user or Premium capacity for an audience. Many Power BI projects discover this only when finance asks for a tax-return-style export.
Larger semantic models and more refreshes are the operational pressure points. Pro caps semantic models at 1 GB and 8 refreshes a day. PPU and Premium lift that ceiling to 100 GB on baseline and 48 scheduled refreshes, with higher SKUs going further. If your sales cube has crossed a few hundred million rows, this stops being a feature comparison and starts being an existence question, the same crunch teams hit when they outgrow their first Power BI composite model and need real capacity behind it.
AI visuals and cognitive services , including Key Influencers at scale, AutoML, and image and text analytics inside dataflows, live on Premium and PPU only. As enterprises lean into generative BI , agentic BI , and AI for business intelligence , this gap will widen, not close.
On-premises hosting via Power BI Report Server is a Premium-only entitlement, important to regulated organizations that cannot put reports in the cloud. It is also part of why some financial-services teams stay on Premium even when the user math marginally favors Pro, often as part of a wider BI migration for financial services program.
The Cost Math: When Does Premium Beat Pro? This is the calculation every buyer needs and most decks skip. The break-even depends on how many of your users are creators and how many are consumers, and the answer surprises people in both directions.
Take a simple model: $14 per Pro user per month, $5,002.67 per month for F64 (pay-as-you-go list). Premium at F64 still requires authors to hold a Pro or PPU license, so the comparison is between (Pro for everyone) and (Pro for authors plus F64 capacity with free viewers).
If 100% of users build content, F64 has no economic advantage; you would still need Pro for all of them, plus the capacity bill. If 10% of users build and 90% consume, the picture flips fast. At 500 users with 50 creators, Pro for everyone costs $7,000 a month; Pro for 50 creators plus F64 costs $700 plus $5,002.67, or $5,702.67, a clean win for Premium. At 1,000 users with 100 creators, Pro costs $14,000 and Premium costs $6,402.67, a much bigger win.
The often-quoted break-even of “350 to 400 users” assumes a roughly 100% creator mix and ignores Azure reservation discounts. For a realistic 10% creator base and a reserved F64 SKU at the discounted rate, the break-even is closer to 250 to 280 total users. Below that, Pro wins. Above it, Premium wins, and the savings compound as the audience grows. The same compounding shows up in adjacent decisions like migrating legacy BI to Power BI , where the consumption shape decides the SKU more than the headcount does.
Kanerika Service
Kanerika Power BI Services
Power BI implementation, license rationalization, Fabric migration, and managed analytics, delivered by a CMMI Level 3 appraised, ISO 27001 certified Microsoft Solutions Partner with a deep Power BI practice.
See Power BI Services One nuance most spreadsheets miss: the autoscale and pay-as-you-go flexibility of Fabric capacity means you can pause capacity outside business hours, which can cut effective cost by 30 to 50% for organizations whose dashboards are not consumed at 3 a.m. That alone can pull the break-even below 200 users.
Power BI Premium Per User (PPU): The Middle Path PPU is the SKU most decks forget to mention, and it solves a very specific problem cleanly. It gives a single user Premium-grade features, larger models, more refreshes, paginated reports, advanced AI, without forcing the whole organization onto capacity.
The classic fit is a small advanced analytics team, four to eight people who need 50 GB semantic models or AutoML, embedded inside a wider organization that does not yet need capacity. PPU lets them build advanced content without buying F64. The catch is that PPU-licensed content can only be viewed by other PPU users, so it does not solve the “free viewers” problem. Mixing PPU authors with Pro viewers leads to predictable confusion, content the author published does not open for the audience, because the audience is not licensed to read PPU content.
A practical pattern: use Pro for the bulk of authors and viewers, PPU for a small group that needs the advanced features now, and earmark a Premium capacity migration for when the viewer count grows. This staged approach is also how mature analytics teams scale, treating the SKU choice as a function of usage maturity, not a single board decision. It maps neatly onto the same staged thinking behind a data analytics strategy and a maturing self-service analytics capability that grow with the organization.
Capability Power BI Pro Premium Per User (PPU) Premium Capacity (F64+) Licensing model Per user Per user Tenant capacity List price $14 / user / month $24 / user / month $5,002.67 / month (F64 PAYG) Free viewer access No No (PPU viewers only) Yes (the headline rule) Max semantic model 1 GB 100 GB 100 GB baseline, more at higher SKUs Scheduled refreshes / day 8 48 48 (higher with XMLA writes) Paginated reports No Yes Yes AI visuals / AutoML Standard only Full Full + cognitive services On-premises (Report Server) No No Yes XMLA endpoints Read only (limited) Read / write Read / write Fabric workloads No No Yes (shared capacity)
Fabric Capacity: The 2024 Reset You Cannot Ignore The Power BI Premium per-capacity (P) SKUs were retired in 2024 and replaced by Microsoft Fabric F SKUs. In practice this means three things every buyer evaluating Power BI Premium today needs to know.
First, when you buy “Premium capacity” now, you are buying Microsoft Fabric capacity. The same v-cores that run your Power BI semantic models also power Fabric Lakehouse, Warehouse, Data Factory, Real-Time Intelligence, and Notebooks. If your organization is not yet using Fabric, the extra workloads are inert and free to ignore; if you are, the capacity is shared, which makes sizing more complex and more rewarding.
Second, the SKU naming changed. The old P1 maps to F64 on the Fabric side, P2 to F128, P3 to F256, with the same dedicated v-core counts. The pricing changed too, in some cases meaningfully; teams renewing into Fabric should re-run the cost math, not assume the old P pricing carries over.
Third, Fabric introduced pay-as-you-go, hourly billing, and pause/resume capacity, none of which Premium P SKUs offered. This is the lever that bends the cost curve for many organizations and turns “is Premium worth it” into “what is our capacity utilization pattern”. For teams already weighing Microsoft Fabric vs Power BI as a broader platform question, or evaluating an Azure to Fabric migration , the licensing reset effectively forces a Fabric conversation whether you wanted one or not.
Choosing the Right Power BI License: A Decision Framework The choice usually compresses into five questions, in this order. Working through them in sequence avoids the feature-shopping trap that pulls organizations into the wrong SKU.
What share of your users build versus consume? If almost everyone builds, stay on Pro. If most consume, start the Premium math.How many total users will access content? Below roughly 250, Pro wins under most consumption mixes. Between 250 and 500, Premium typically wins for read-heavy mixes. Above 500, Premium almost always wins unless your creator share is unusually high.Do you need Premium-only features for a small team? If yes, use PPU for that team while keeping the rest of the organization on Pro.Will you use Microsoft Fabric workloads beyond Power BI? If yes, the same Fabric capacity already pays for itself in compute you would otherwise buy separately, which tilts the answer toward F64+.Are you regulated and need on-premises hosting? If yes, Premium is mandatory, the Pro versus Premium comparison ends here.The trap to avoid is buying the SKU that “future-proofs” without checking whether the future actually arrives. Many organizations bought P1 in 2020 for a viewer audience that never materialized and paid for that mistake for years. The current Fabric SKUs at least let you pause capacity, which softens the regret if usage falls short, but the right move is still to size to the next 12 months and revisit, not to buy ahead for a five-year vision. Pairing the SKU choice with a clear view of Power BI vs Tableau , Qlik Sense vs Power BI , and Looker vs Power BI keeps the conversation honest about what the organization actually needs.
Talk to Kanerika
Need a Second Opinion on Your Power BI License?
Kanerika reviews your current Pro and Premium spend against actual viewer patterns, models an F64 reservation, and lays out the SKU that fits the next 12 months. A short working session turns the question into a plan.
Schedule a Working Session → Migration: Moving from Power BI Pro to Premium (and Back) Most organizations move from Pro to Premium, not the other way. The migration is technically straightforward but operationally underestimated, and the teams that handle it well treat it as a content migration project, not a license swap.
The mechanical steps are simple. Buy the Fabric F64 or higher capacity. Create a Premium-capacity workspace. Move existing workspaces into it through the admin portal. Reassign content. Verify dataset refresh and gateway connectivity. The new free-viewer rights take effect immediately; existing Pro users can either keep their licenses (still needed to publish or modify) or be downgraded to free if they only consume.
The operational work is where projects slip. Capacity must be sized for peak refresh, not average usage. Semantic models that ran on Pro’s 1 GB ceiling sometimes balloon when freed of that constraint, and an oversized model on F64 is a throttling waiting to happen. Refresh schedules, gateway placements, and row-level security inheritance all need a sanity check. Premium also opens deployment pipelines as a feature, which most teams adopt during the migration rather than later, the same lift teams plan for inside a broader Power BI deployment pipelines rollout.
The reverse move, Premium to Pro, is rare but real, usually triggered by a budget review when actual viewer counts came in below forecast. It works mechanically the same way, but viewer access is the breaking point: any non-Pro user loses access when content leaves Premium, so a communication plan is non-negotiable. The same content-migration discipline applies whether you are moving from Cognos to Power BI or modernizing the upstream cloud data warehouse behind it.
Scenario (10% creators) Pro for everyone Pro for authors + F64 Winner 100 users (10 creators) $1,400 / month $140 + $5,003 = $5,143 Pro 250 users (25 creators) $3,500 / month $350 + $5,003 = $5,353 Pro (break-even ~360 list / ~250 reserved)500 users (50 creators) $7,000 / month $700 + $5,003 = $5,703 Premium 1,000 users (100 creators) $14,000 / month $1,400 + $5,003 = $6,403 Premium (saves ~54%)2,500 users (250 creators) $35,000 / month $3,500 + $5,003 = $8,503 Premium (saves ~76%)
Common Mistakes Buyers Make on Power BI Licensing Across the licensing reviews we run, the same handful of mistakes show up again and again. None of them are exotic; all of them are expensive.
Buying F32 or below to “try Premium” . Below F64, you do not get free-viewer rights, so all users still need Pro. You pay for capacity and Pro at the same time.Forgetting that authors still need Pro on Premium . Premium replaces viewer licenses, not author licenses. Authors must hold Pro or PPU even on F64+.Sizing capacity for average load instead of peak refresh . The refresh window is when capacity gets stressed. Sizing for steady-state load leads to throttling on Mondays.Mixing PPU authors with Pro viewers . PPU content cannot be viewed by Pro or free users; only other PPU users can read it. The mismatch creates dashboards that mysteriously do not open.Ignoring the Microsoft 365 E5 bundle . If your enterprise already runs E5, you may already own Power BI Pro at the seat level. Confirm before negotiating a separate Pro line.Buying capacity ahead of demand . A P1, now F64, sized for an audience that did not arrive used to be a five-year tax. With Fabric’s pause/resume, it is less punishing now, but still avoidable if you size to the next year.The thread through all six is the same: license the actual workload, not the aspirational one, and revisit the choice as usage matures.
Case Study
Transforming Data Management and Analytics with Power BI for Northgate
Kanerika delivered a Power BI led data and analytics modernization for Northgate, replacing scattered reports with governed dashboards and giving leadership a single source of truth across operations and finance.
Read the Case Study → Governance, Security, and Compliance Across SKUs Licensing also touches the boundary of governance, in ways most buyers discover after the purchase. The headline rule: Power BI’s core security model, Azure AD authentication, row-level security, sensitivity labels, audit logs, applies across Pro, PPU, and Premium. The difference is the degree of control and the granularity of monitoring you get at each tier.
Premium capacity adds tenant-level controls that Pro does not expose, including capacity workload settings, XMLA endpoints for third-party tools, and the per-workspace assignment of capacity which is what enables admin policies around refresh windows and memory limits. For organizations leaning into Microsoft Purview for unified data governance and a broader data governance framework , Premium also integrates more cleanly with Purview lineage and classification, which is a soft but real reason regulated enterprises end up on capacity even when the user math is close.
Compliance certifications, SOC, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, are the same across tiers, because they apply to the underlying Power BI service rather than the SKU. Microsoft’s Trust Center documents the full certification list. Where SKUs differ is in the enforcement levers: Premium gives admins more knobs to enforce policy at scale, and on-premises hosting via Power BI Report Server is a Premium-only path. None of this changes the headline cost decision, but it can move a tied-on-numbers comparison toward Premium for regulated organizations. The licensing call also sits inside a wider Azure cost optimization review, where Power BI capacity is one line item among many.
How Kanerika Helps Enterprises Get Power BI Licensing Right Kanerika sits at the intersection of Microsoft platform delivery and data analytics, and our teams run Power BI licensing reviews as a standard part of a broader data analytics engagement . We have done the math for retailers with 4,000 store viewers, manufacturers with 200 plant managers, and banks with 1,500 mixed analysts and viewers, and the pattern is consistent: the right SKU follows from the consumption shape, not the headcount alone, and the wrong SKU compounds quietly across a multi-year contract.
Our approach starts with a usage audit, who actually opens dashboards, how often, and which models drive the cost, before any SKU is recommended. We benchmark current Pro spend against an F64 reservation and a PPU pilot, factor in any Microsoft 365 E5 bundling, and model the next 12 months of growth rather than a five-year mirage. For organizations moving onto Premium, we plan the capacity sizing against refresh peaks, not averages, which is what avoids the throttling-on-Mondays trap that hits unprepared rollouts. As a CMMI Level 3-appraised, ISO 27001-certified Microsoft Solutions Partner with a deep Power BI practice, we have both the credentials and the delivery scars to recommend the SKU that survives the next budget review.
One opinion we hold from delivery experience, and it runs counter to the usual advice: most mid-market enterprises should stay on Pro longer than their reseller suggests, and jump to F64 only once viewer counts are real, not promised. Below 250 users, Premium rarely pays back. Between 250 and 500, the answer depends on creator share and Microsoft 365 bundling. Above 500 with a read-heavy mix, Premium is almost always the right move, and the migration is most successful when the team treats it as a capacity-sizing and content-migration project rather than a procurement event. For organizations also weighing Power BI vs Excel as the everyday tool for finance, the SKU choice and the rollout decision often need to be made together.
Whether you are scoping a first Power BI rollout, renewing into Fabric, or rationalizing an oversized capacity, our data analytics services , our data integration practice , and our work on Power BI dashboard development give the SKU decision the operational grounding it deserves. The right license is the one your users actually consume, priced for the next year, not the one your contract template defaults to.
Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between Power BI Pro and Power BI Premium? Power BI Pro is a per-user license at $14 per month; every person who creates, shares, or views Pro content needs a seat. Power BI Premium is tenant-level dedicated capacity (today sold as Microsoft Fabric F SKUs). Authors still need a Pro or Premium Per User license to publish, but at F64 and above, free Power BI users can view content hosted in that capacity. Pro licenses people; Premium licenses capacity.
How much does Power BI Premium cost in 2026? Power BI Premium is now sold as Microsoft Fabric capacity. The F64 SKU, which is the smallest capacity that unlocks free-viewer rights for Power BI content, lists at $5,002.67 per month on pay-as-you-go pricing. Azure reservations cut that by roughly 40 percent. Premium Per User (PPU) is the per-user Premium tier and lists at $24 per user per month.
At what user count does Power BI Premium beat Pro? For a typical mix of 10 percent creators and 90 percent consumers, Premium at F64 (reserved pricing) beats Pro at roughly 250 to 280 total users. With list-price pay-as-you-go, the break-even is closer to 350 to 400 users. Below that, Pro is cheaper; above it, Premium is cheaper and the savings compound as the audience grows.
What is Power BI Premium Per User (PPU) and when should you use it? PPU is a $24 per user per month license that gives a single user Premium-grade features, larger models, more refreshes, paginated reports, and advanced AI, without buying tenant capacity. It fits a small advanced analytics team of four to eight people embedded inside a wider Pro estate. The catch is that PPU content can only be viewed by other PPU users, so it does not solve the free-viewer problem at scale.
Did Microsoft retire the Power BI Premium P SKUs? Yes. The Power BI Premium per-capacity P SKUs were retired in 2024 and replaced by Microsoft Fabric F SKUs. Buying Premium capacity today means buying Fabric capacity. The old P1 maps to F64, P2 to F128, and P3 to F256, with the same dedicated v-core counts but different pricing and a new pay-as-you-go and pause/resume billing model that the P SKUs never offered.
Do authors still need Power BI Pro on a Premium capacity? Yes. Premium capacity replaces viewer licenses, not author licenses. Anyone who publishes, modifies, or owns Power BI content still needs a Pro or PPU seat. The free-viewer rights at F64 and above apply only to people who consume reports, not to people who build or maintain them. Forgetting this is the single most common procurement misread.
Is Microsoft Fabric the same thing as Power BI Premium? They overlap, but they are not the same. Microsoft Fabric is a broader analytics platform that includes Lakehouse, Warehouse, Data Factory, Real-Time Intelligence, and Notebooks. Power BI Premium today is what you get when you buy Fabric capacity at F64 or above. The same v-cores that run your Power BI semantic models also power the Fabric workloads, so if you use both, the capacity is shared.
